By WILLIAM R. MATTOX JR.
Knight Ridder/Tribune News Service
Once dismissed as a fringe movement for left-wing hippies and right-wing Bible
thumpers, homeschooling has gone mainstream. In fact, several recent news stories report that more than 1 million
young people in America are now being homeschooled. And these reports suggest that home
schooling increasingly appeals to a broad array of families.
Indeed, a Newsweek cover story on the topic probably should have been
titled, "Homeschooling: It Isn't Just For Freaks and Geeks
Anymore." And a similar Washington Post news story easily could
have been headlined, "Homeschooling: Now Normal People Are Doing
It, Too."
All of this media enthusiasm for homeschooling has me and my wife
wishing that Barbara Mandrell would release a new recording titled,
"I Was Homeschooling When Homeschooling Wasn't Cool." That's
because my wife and I are part of that cultural riff-raff who got
involved in homeschooling back when it was considered gauche to do so.
Oddly enough, part of the reason we began homeschooling seven years ago
is because we don't want our children to become social retards. Now, to
some people, I am sure that probably sounds as weird as the recent hit
song by that homeschooled trio, Hanson.
But my wife and I are convinced that, properly understood, homeschooling
actually offers young people some significant social advantages. I say
"properly understood" because most folks who have never met a
homeschooling family imagine that the kids are about as socially
isolated (and as socially awkward) as Bobby Boucher, the Cajun
"momma's boy" Adam Sandler portrays in the hit film, "The
Waterboy."
In truth, the home-schooled child is regularly involved in 5.2 social
activities outside the home, on average, according to a recent study by
Dr. Brian Ray of the National Home Education Research Institute.
These activities include |

Homeschooled children tend to interact with people of
different ages, like the "real world."

afternoon and weekend programs with conventionally schooled kids, such as ballet classes, Little League
Teams, Scout troops, church groups and
neighborhood play. And they also often include midday field trips and
cooperative programs organized by groups of homeschooling families. For
example, my wife and daughter are currently taking a foreign-language
class from a French woman who lives nearby. And our daughter is also
part of a homeschool drama troupe.
So, what most distinguishes a homeschoolers'
social lifes from that of a conventionally schooled child? Two things
stand out in my mind. First, homeschooled children tend to interact more
with people of different ages. This is actually more like the "real
world:" What businessperson's social interaction is largely
restricted to those born in the same year? And it reduces the degree to
which children find themselves constantly and obsessively being compared
to, and comparing themselves with, other children their age. (From an
educational standpoint, this reduced consciousness about age also means
that homeschooled "late bloomers" tend to avoid being
stigmatized as "learning-disabled" or "slow
learners" which is no doubt one of the many reasons why Ray found
average test scores for homeschooled kids are 30 to 37 percentile points
higher thanfor conventionally schooled students.)
Second, homeschooled children tend to draw
their primary social identity from their membership in a particular
family rather than from their membership in a particular peer group.
This increases the likelihood that young people will see themselves as a
vital member of an intergenerational community rather than as a member
of "A Tribe Apart." That's the phrase author Patricia Hersch
uses to describe the conventionally schooled suburban kids she followed
through adolescence recently. According to Hersch, many schoolkids today
feel isolated from the grown-up world, and alienated from |
patents who
fail to take an interest in their lives and to set boundaries for their
behavior. Now, Hersch's
intention isn't to make a case for home- schooling. (She doesn't
significantly address the issue.) But the angst-ridden teens she
describes in "A Tribe Apart" closely resemble the peer-
obsessed
students Seattle public high school teacher David Guterson talks about
in his compelling book "Family Matters: Why Homeschooling Makes
Sense." Guterson reports that the kids in his conventional school
often have difficulty navigating the turbulent social scene at school,
with "its cliques, rumors and relentless gossip, its shifting
alliances and expedient betrayals."
Guterson writes, "Peer obsessiveness and the clique mentality are
the natural responses of children to mass schooling, which in essence
removes adults from their lives or rather puts them there at a ratio of
one to 30 and in an authoritarian role not entirely conducive to the
forming of meaningful relationships."
Moreover, Guterson says that preoccupation with peer acceptance often
encourages young people to become "acutely attuned to a pre-adult
commercial culture that usurps their attention (MTV, Nintendo, fashion
magazines, teen cinema)."
Now, none of this means that every homeschooler is socially
well-adjusted. Or that homeschooling is the only way for parents to
raise children successfully. Or that good things never happen in
conventional schools. Indeed, if our own experience is any indication
(our two oldest children have each spent a year or two in public
school), there are many outstanding teacher and principals involved in
conventional schools today who really do make a significant difference
in the lives of their students.
Nevertheless, a number of re cent research studies suggest that
homeschooling offers some significant educational and social benefits.
No wonder so many "normal" people are starting to give
homeschooling a try.

William R. Mattox Jr. of Montclair, Va., is an award-winning writer who frequently reports on new research findings. |